Giving a cold shoulder to C.O.O.L.
The election is over; the government has just realized we have been in a recession since last fall (2007); farm commodity prices have fallen 60 percent (yet food prices have yet to decline); and the U.S. Treasury is bailing out every mismanaged bank, corporation and/or business in this country. What a place and time to live!
The new administration campaigned for more than 20 months for change. Let’s hope they mean it and start with the government enforcing laws on the books and not creating needless chaos by implementing confusing legislation such as C.O.O.L.
C.O.O.L. (Country-of-origin-labeling), as Bob Elliott pointed out in his Oct. 11 column, originated in the 2002 Farm Bill. Originally, the intent was simple: Inform consumers where their food came from. As usual, the government spent six more years “tinkering” with the concept and now has created a bookkeeping and bureaucratic mess.
C.O.O.L. is not now, nor was ever intended to be a food safety issue. If the government was truly concerned about the consumer, they would hire more meat inspectors to monitor processing facilities and imported meat instead of cutting the inspection force by 60 percent. C.O.O.L. labeling regulations were written only for meat processors and retailers with perishable purchases more than $230,000. Obviously this doesn’t cover every source of meat.
Another problem with C.O.O.L. is that it doesn’t cover every type of meat. Processed foods are not required to be labeled, nor are restaurants required to notify consumers of the origin of their steaks, chops or chicken.
On the producer side, we will have to fill out one of three affidavits and/or C.O.O.L. declarations. The first is a continuous declaration to be kept on file by the market, stocker, feeder or slaughter plant until revoked. The second is a supporting declaration of origin from producers with a continuous affidavit on file. The third statement covers direct transactions to packers from producers, marketing business and feeders. Packers are required to maintain these records for at least one year, and they must be able to obtain records from their immediate suppliers within that one-year period. All cow-calf producers are subject to this verification process as well. What a great Christmas present this year. More government paperwork.
The labels that retailers and wholesalers are using are also confusing the public. This happens because of the importing for slaughter and/or feeding in this country of cattle from Mexico and Canada. If the label reads “Product of U.S., Canada or Mexico,” it is business as usual. Same package, same meat, different label with the U.S. first, and it sells.
We, as a nation, must admit we are spoiled with all the selection we have in this country and really what little we spend on food. Yes, we need to support American agriculture, but let us not muddy the waters with cumbersome legislation that just confuses the buying public and causes mountains of basically useless paperwork.
We have a safe food supply in this country. We need to keep it that way and to make sure of the safety and nutrition of the sources of our imported foods. Today’s economy is a world economy; isolating ourselves won’t help. The USDA has estimated it could cost the livestock and meat industry around $2.5 billion in the first year to implement C.O.O.L. This money would/could be better spent on hiring more meat inspectors and ensuring food safety.
Mr. Obama: Good luck with your CHANGE, but I would suggest you look at the K.I.S.S. option for your government first — Keep It Simple, not Stupid.
I wish everyone a happy and Merry Christmas, and I would hope we all remember the true reason for the season, the birth of our Lord and Savior. Enjoy some beef during the holidays.
Larry Magnuson is a Bureau County cow-calf producer and dues director on the Illinois Beef Association Board.










