Common sense would go a long way

Text Size: AaAaAaAaAa

This is a spring that will be talked about for decades. Rain, rain and more rain. I am writing this on May 6, and I still haven’t planted a kernel of corn! In 1977, I thought it was bad when we finished planting corn on May 12. Oh well, farmers have always had to work with and around the weather, but this is getting serious.

This spring’s calving season started fine with cows dropping calves fast and furious on cold but dry ground. Then the rains and mud came to make the last 25 percent of the calving very rough indeed. Talking to other cow-calf operators let me know that we all faced the same problems. More twins born than anyone could remember before, but also more trampling of calves and being laid on when cows bunched together to stay on dry ground. I’ll take the cold weather every time.

On the national and state levels, cattlemen are still battling PETA and HSUS, but now we are in real danger of having to pay a cow “fart” tax. The U.S. Congress and U.S. EPA are seeking to stem global climate change linked to carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. Representatives Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) are the sponsors of this bill.

Proposed EPA rules would cover activities that emit more than 100 tons of carbon per year. A dairy cow typically emits the equivalent of roughly four tons per year and operators with more than 25 cows could face permitting fees of at least $45 per ton starting with their 26th animal. Beef, swine and cow-calf operators would also be affected to various degrees.

There are more proposed rules that would impact fuel, fertilizer and energy industries, further driving up a farmer’s cost of production. These increases would then put U.S. farmers at further disadvantages in the international markets. This would not be good as the U.S. Meat Export Federation just reported that total beef exports were up 4 percent in volume and 1 percent in value. Also, beef muscle cuts were up 9 percent. Ag exports are the only positive in the U.S. balance of trade.

Previous Page|1||

Comments


National Video